Understanding Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine in Injury Cases

When an accident happens in Florida, the question of who is responsible for the damages can often be complicated. Many times, it’s clear that the person directly responsible for causing the injury is at fault. However, in other situations, things are less straightforward. One important legal concept that may come into play in such cases is Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine. This doctrine plays a significant role in determining liability, and understanding how it works can help you better navigate injury cases where it applies.

What Is the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine?

Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine holds that the owner of a dangerous instrument, like a vehicle or heavy machinery, can be held responsible for injuries caused by that instrument, even if someone else was using it. The rationale behind this law is that the owner of an item that has the potential to cause harm should bear responsibility if it is used improperly or causes damage.

The doctrine dates back to a case in the 1920s and has since become a part of Florida’s legal landscape. Essentially, it means that certain instruments—especially those like cars, trucks, and boats—are so dangerous by nature that the owner can be held liable for accidents involving these instruments, even if they weren’t the ones using it at the time. The idea is that the owner of these dangerous items should be accountable for ensuring they are used safely, especially when others are behind the wheel or in control of the item.

How Does It Work in Injury Cases?

In Florida, if a person causes an accident while driving a car, the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine may make the vehicle’s owner liable for damages, even if they weren’t driving. For example, if someone borrows your car and causes an accident, you, as the owner, could be held responsible for any injuries or damages that occur—even if you were not in the car at all. This is because, under the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, the law assumes that the owner of the car (or any other dangerous instrument) is liable for its use, whether they were driving it or not. The person actually driving the vehicle may also be held responsible, but the owner’s liability remains.

Michael Serrano

Founding Attorney

Candace “Cea” Hartley

Attorney

Molli Gard, ESQ.

Attorney

This might seem unfair to an owner who wasn’t even involved in the accident, but the law sees it as a form of accountability. Because certain instruments (like cars) can cause significant harm, it holds the owners of these items responsible for their safe use. If an accident occurs, the owner of the instrument—whether it’s a car, boat, or other machinery—may be found liable for the damages.

When Does the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine Apply?

Typically, the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine is associated with the ownership and use of motor vehicles, but it can apply to other dangerous instruments under certain circumstances. The main conditions for the doctrine to apply include proving the ownership of the dangerous instrument, showing that the instrument was being used by another person, and demonstrating that the use of that instrument directly caused an injury or damage.

Quote

Mike Serrano’s law office was everything I needed after a very traumatic accident. He was always super up front and honest with me. I never got the feeling he was trying to sell me on something or to do something that I wasn’t comfortable with. He listened to my concerns and when it tough moments came that I needed to stand my ground. He backed me and made me feel 100% secure. He got me exactly what I needed in a settlement and I would never consider using anyone else. His office staff is also phenomenal.”

- Mary

Quote

Mike Serrano was a great attorney for my case!! He was very flexible with phone calls/ Zoom meetings. His staff are always friendly, whether it be on the phone or emails. They keep you updated during your entire case! They don’t leave you silent for months. if you call, they always call back with updates! Highly recommend!"

- Kylie Collier Border

Quote

I’ve never had to deal with a lawyer before but Mike has set the bar HIGH. He was always available to communicate my concerns and explain each step of the way. I know no other lawyer would have been able to achieve the same results because he jumped on an opportunity that was a little out of the ordinary and it paid off. He really fought for my case and over delivered. I really hope I never have another accident but if I do I’m running to Mike for help."

- Sandy Carter

For example, let’s say you lend your boat to a friend for the weekend, and they cause an accident while on the water. If someone is injured in the accident, you—as the boat owner—could be held responsible for the harm caused, even though you weren’t on the boat at the time. In this scenario, the person using the boat could also be liable, but you, as the owner, are also held responsible due to the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine.

The doctrine applies to more than just motor vehicles. It can also extend to other dangerous instruments like construction equipment, machinery, or even boats. If these instruments cause harm when used by someone else, the owner of the instrument can be held liable for the injury or damage that results.

What Does This Mean for Injury Victims?

If you are involved in an accident and the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine could apply, it’s crucial to understand how it affects your case. The doctrine may not only hold the person using the instrument responsible but could also involve the owner in the liability. This can potentially increase your chances of receiving compensation for the injury or damages you’ve suffered.

For example, in a car accident, if the person driving the vehicle doesn’t have sufficient insurance or assets to cover your medical bills and other damages, the owner’s insurance or assets may be available to you. By holding both the owner and the person driving the vehicle liable, the law opens up more opportunities for you to recover damages. If you are an injury victim, having the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine in place could potentially make a significant difference in your ability to be compensated fairly for your losses.

Related Videos

Choosing The Right Personal Injury Attorney

Personal Injury Settlement Timeline

What Happens If You Are the Owner of a Dangerous Instrument?

If you are the owner of a vehicle, boat, or another dangerous instrument, you need to be aware of the responsibilities that come with owning such an item. If you allow someone else to use your vehicle or equipment and they cause an accident, you could be held accountable under the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine.

For example, if a friend borrows your car and gets into a crash, you could be liable for the damages, even though you were not driving. This makes it important to carefully consider who you allow to use your vehicle or equipment. If you own a dangerous instrument, you are ultimately responsible for its safe use, whether you’re the one driving it or not. You should also check your insurance policy to ensure that it covers accidents caused by others using your vehicle or machinery.

Case Results

Car Accident

This client was injured in an auto accident with a driver who improperly merged into her lane. Her vehicle was totaled. She sustained an aggravation of her pre-existing disc herniations in her neck and new disc herniations in her lower back. We obtained the full limits of both the at-fault driver’s bodily injury coverage and our client’s underinsured motorist coverage, which were significant. The settlement was achieved without a law suit and within four months after the client finished treating.

Rear End Collision

This particular client was injured in an accident in late 2015 when she was rear-ended. She sustained an aggravation of pre-existing disc herniations in her neck and a new disc herniation which ultimately required a surgical fusion. By the time of trial, her medical bills exceeded $180,000.00. The Defendants’ offer pre-suit was $20,000.00. We were able to obtain a jury verdict of $441,000.00, plus attorneys’ fees.

Car Accident

A client was injured in a rear-end collision where he sustained an aggravation of a pre-existing disc bulge that developed into a herniation in his lower back. We obtained a jury verdict which was over 6 times what had been offered prior to trial.

Car Accident

In this case, our client injured her shoulder after being struck by a vehicle while she was performing volunteer services. The driver was traveling at such a high rate of speed entering a parking lot that he clipped another vehicle, hit a parking barrier and was launched into a tree. After the client attempted to negotiate with the insurance company prior to hiring us, we were able to obtain an amount that was over double the prior offer.

Intentional Torts

Our client was injured from an assault by a patron of a party while working security. His shoulder required multiple surgeries. He hired our office to pursue a claim to recoup his medical bills, which exceeded $130,000.00. After his assailant offered him $10,000.00 to resolve his case, we took the case to a jury to decide. The jury awarded our client all of his medical bills and tripled his award for pain and suffering.

Car Accident

This client came to us about a car wreck that occurred in 2014 where she sustained injuries. She approached our firm just one week before the statute of limitations was set to expire after being turned away by several other law firms. We filed a lawsuit and were able to obtain the limits of the at-fault driver’s bodily injury coverage and an additional settlement from the client’s insurance carrier.

Truck Crash

This couple was injured in an automobile accident after they were rear-ended in a seven-car pileup caused by a semi-trailer. Of the 15 people who made claims on the same insurance policy, our clients each received the second and third highest offers, which covered all of their past and future medical bills and their attorney’s fees.

Truck Crash

In this case, our client was injured from a rear-end collision with an eighteen-wheeler. Her original lawyer procured a settlement offer of $7,000.00 to settle her case. Because the offer did not approach the amount of bills she incurred from accident related treatment, she came to our firm for a consultation. She decided to hire us. We promptly filed suit and obtained a settlement for her.

Does Insurance Play a Role?

In cases involving the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, insurance can be an important factor. For example, in car accident cases, the vehicle’s insurance may cover the damages caused by the accident. If the person who caused the accident was not the owner, their insurance might also be involved in paying for the damages.

If you are the owner of a vehicle, boat, or another dangerous instrument, it’s essential to make sure your insurance policy provides adequate coverage in the event of an accident. If you’re an injured party, the insurance policies of both the driver and the owner may come into play, providing more avenues for recovering compensation for your injuries.

What If You’re Injured?

If you’ve been injured in an accident where the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine may apply, gathering information about the ownership and use of the vehicle or dangerous instrument is crucial. Knowing who owns the item that caused your injury, as well as who was using it at the time, will help you understand who may be liable for your damages.

In some cases, the owner may have more insurance coverage or assets to compensate you than the person actually driving or operating the instrument. This could improve your chances of recovering the compensation you deserve for things like medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Consulting with an experienced personal injury attorney can help you better understand how the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine applies to your case and guide you through the legal process of seeking compensation.

Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine is a legal principle that holds owners of dangerous instruments, like vehicles or boats, responsible for accidents caused by those instruments, even if they weren’t the ones using them at the time. Whether you are an injury victim or the owner of a dangerous instrument, it’s essential to understand how this doctrine works. It can affect liability in injury cases, ensuring that the owners of dangerous instruments are held accountable for any harm caused.

If you’ve been involved in an injury case where the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine may apply, you should consult with an experienced attorney. At Serrano Law, we are committed to helping you understand your rights and responsibilities under Florida law. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help with your injury case.

To learn more about this subject click here: Minimum Amount Medical Bills Needed For a Personal Injury Case